Numerische Mathematik

4.7k papers and 164.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.7k papers published in Numerische Mathematik in the last decades have received a total of 164.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Numerische Mathematik usually cover Computational Mechanics (2.2k papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (2.1k papers) and Numerical Analysis (1.8k papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (1.6k papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (1.0k papers) and Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (803 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Numerische Mathematik are E. Dijkstra, C. Reinsch, Ivo Babuška, Jean-Claude Nédélec, Grace Wahba, Gene H. Golub, Christian Lubich, Jim Douglas, John H. Halton and Volker Strassen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Numerische Mathematik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Numerische Mathematik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Numerische Mathematik.

Countries where authors publish in Numerische Mathematik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Numerische Mathematik. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Numerische Mathematik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Numerische Mathematik more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025