Alessio Celi
-
- Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates 22
- Quantum many-body systems 17
- Topological Materials and Phenomena 10
- Quantum and electron transport phenomena 5
- Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research 4
- Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics 4
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism 5
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics top 10%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
-
- Quantum Information and Cryptography 5
Alessio Celi
36 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.8k
- Condensed Matter Physics 428
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 278
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics 20
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 248
Countries citing papers authored by Alessio Celi
This map shows the geographic impact of Alessio Celi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alessio Celi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alessio Celi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alessio Celi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alessio Celi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alessio Celi. The network helps show where Alessio Celi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alessio Celi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 45 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 48 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 71 | |
| 12 | Simulating lattice gauge theories within quantum technologiesbreakdown → | 2019 | 360 |
| 13 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 17 | Synthetic Gauge Fields in Synthetic Dimensionsbreakdown → | 2014 | 426 |
| 18 | 2012 | 215 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 258 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 12 |
About Alessio Celi
Alessio Celi is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 38 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (22 papers), Quantum many-body systems (17 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (10 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (5 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (5 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.8k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (428 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (278 citations). Alessio Celi has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Italy and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Maciej Lewenstein, Luca Tagliacozzo, Pietro Massignan, Nathan Goldman, Gediminas Juzeliūnas, I. B. Spielman, Julius Ruseckas, José I. Latorre, Leticia Tarruell and Peter Orland. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.