Albert Trinh-Duc

1.4k total citations
13 papers, 108 citations indexed

About

Albert Trinh-Duc is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Albert Trinh-Duc has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 108 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology and 2 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Albert Trinh-Duc's work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers), Healthcare Systems and Practices (3 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers). Albert Trinh-Duc is often cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers), Healthcare Systems and Practices (3 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers). Albert Trinh-Duc collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and Belgium. Albert Trinh-Duc's co-authors include Patrice Queneau, B Bannwarth, J. Bouget, F. Carpentier, Béatrice Trombert, A. Santin, C. Gall, Patrick Ecollan, Olivier Traxer and Pierre‐Marie Roy and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ Open, Thrombosis Research and Archives of cardiovascular diseases.

In The Last Decade

Albert Trinh-Duc

12 papers receiving 102 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Albert Trinh-Duc France 7 36 34 25 20 16 13 108
Sophie Renet France 9 29 0.8× 21 0.6× 5 0.2× 11 0.6× 18 1.1× 24 201
Mandelin Cooper United States 7 18 0.5× 12 0.4× 10 0.4× 5 0.3× 3 0.2× 16 123
Naser Hadavand Iran 5 44 1.2× 14 0.4× 17 0.7× 9 0.5× 7 0.4× 13 111
Kateřina Malá‐Ládová Czechia 8 29 0.8× 7 0.2× 28 1.1× 13 0.7× 3 0.2× 26 239
Annika M. Jödicke United Kingdom 8 16 0.4× 9 0.3× 6 0.2× 17 0.8× 6 0.4× 25 198
Michael Ellenbogen United States 7 21 0.6× 33 1.0× 6 0.2× 21 1.1× 3 0.2× 23 203
Luciane Mônica Deboni Brazil 5 32 0.9× 13 0.4× 18 0.7× 10 0.5× 1 0.1× 13 121
Angela Timoney United Kingdom 7 51 1.4× 17 0.5× 23 0.9× 86 4.3× 6 0.4× 11 188
Laia Matas Spain 6 61 1.7× 32 0.9× 24 1.0× 11 0.6× 16 1.0× 19 185
Marco Tuccori Italy 6 23 0.6× 10 0.3× 34 1.4× 9 0.5× 46 2.9× 11 153

Countries citing papers authored by Albert Trinh-Duc

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Albert Trinh-Duc's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Albert Trinh-Duc with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Albert Trinh-Duc more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Albert Trinh-Duc

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Albert Trinh-Duc. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Albert Trinh-Duc. The network helps show where Albert Trinh-Duc may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Albert Trinh-Duc

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Albert Trinh-Duc. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Albert Trinh-Duc based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Albert Trinh-Duc. Albert Trinh-Duc is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
2.
Roy, Pierre‐Marie, et al.. (2020). Comparison of the Wells score and the revised Geneva score as a tool to predict pulmonary embolism in outpatients over age 65. Thrombosis Research. 196. 120–126. 8 indexed citations
3.
Slama, Michel, et al.. (2019). Major ischaemic and bleeding risks following current drug-eluting stent implantation: Are there differences across current drug-eluting stent types in real life?. Archives of cardiovascular diseases. 112(8-9). 469–484. 6 indexed citations
4.
Gueyffier, François, Pascal Piedbois, Jean‐François Bergmann, et al.. (2017). How to measure the net benefit of treatment?. Therapies. 72(1). 51–61. 2 indexed citations
5.
Gueyffier, François, Pascal Piedbois, Jean‐François Bergmann, et al.. (2017). Comment mesure-t-on le bénéfice net d’un traitement ?. Therapies. 72(1). 39–49. 2 indexed citations
6.
7.
8.
Queneau, Patrice, Frédéric Adnet, B Bannwarth, et al.. (2008). Accidents médicamenteux évitables observés dans sept services d’accueil et d’urgences français : prévalence, prévention et dépenses inutiles. Journal Européen des Urgences. 21(1). 22–28. 3 indexed citations
9.
10.
Trinh-Duc, Albert, J. Doucet, B Bannwarth, et al.. (2007). Admissions des sujets âgés aux Services d’Accueil des Urgences pour effets indésirables médicamenteux. Therapies. 62(5). 437–441. 9 indexed citations
11.
Queneau, Patrice, Béatrice Trombert, F. Carpentier, et al.. (2005). Accidents médicamenteux. Annales Pharmaceutiques Françaises. 63(2). 131–142. 21 indexed citations
12.
Trinh-Duc, Albert, A. de La Blanchardière, Raphaël Porcher, et al.. (2004). Mise en place d’un système de recueil et d’évaluation de l’activité médicosociale des permanences d’accès aux soins de santé (PASS). La Revue de Médecine Interne. 26(1). 13–19. 2 indexed citations
13.
Niamké, Sebastien, et al.. (2004). 242 Peut-on dégager un profil social des patients adressés aux pass ? étude multicentrique. Journal Européen des Urgences. 17. 149–149.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sophie Renet Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mandelin Cooper Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Naser Hadavand Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kateřina Malá‐Ládová Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Annika M. Jödicke Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael Ellenbogen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Luciane Mônica Deboni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Angela Timoney Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Laia Matas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marco Tuccori
Rankless by CCL
2026