Thrombosis Research

13.8k papers and 275.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 13.8k papers published in Thrombosis Research in the last decades have received a total of 275.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Thrombosis Research usually cover Hematology (6.0k papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (4.0k papers) and Internal Medicine (3.4k papers) specifically the topics of Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (3.7k papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (3.4k papers) and Platelet Disorders and Treatments (2.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Thrombosis Research are Birger Blombäck, Ulrich Abildgaard, Frederikus A. Klok, John R. Vane, Alok A. Khorana, Menno V. Huisman, M. Lie, F Markwárdt, Marcel Levi and Per Morten Sandset.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Thrombosis Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Thrombosis Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Thrombosis Research.

Countries where authors publish in Thrombosis Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Thrombosis Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Thrombosis Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thrombosis Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025