Lisa Stump
About
In The Last Decade
Lisa Stump
8 papers receiving 132 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Emergency Medical Services 56
- Internal Medicine 28
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 28
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 23
- Pharmacy 23
Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Stump
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Stump's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Stump with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Stump more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Stump
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Stump. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Stump. The network helps show where Lisa Stump may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa Stump
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa Stump. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa Stump based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa Stump. Lisa Stump is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | Blogging to Drive Business Create and Maintain Valuable Customer Connections | 1 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 44 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.