Alan G. Scott

1.3k citations
24 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Alan G. Scott

24 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Alan G. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 717
  • Insect Science 376
  • Microbiology 89
  • Genetics 321
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 159
Replace R.J. Nachman with:
R.J. Nachman United States
J. Joosse Netherlands
Tsuyoshi Kawada Japan
Benjamin J. Cook United States
José L. Maestro Spain
Hanne Duve United Kingdom
Jeroen Poels Belgium
Alan D. Shirras United Kingdom
Ilse Claeys Belgium
B.G. Loughton Canada
Alan G. Scott relative to R.J. Nachman United States R.J. Nachman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
R.J. Nachman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alan G. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alan G. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan G. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan G. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alan G. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan G. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan G. Scott. The network helps show where Alan G. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alan G. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alan G. Scott Line = papers co-authored together Alan G. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200695
2 200252
3
The dipteran Leu-callatostatins: structural and functional diversity in an insect neuroendocrine peptide family.
19989
4 199728
5 199764
6 199760
7 199780
8 199632
9 199644
10 199542
11 199554
12 199547
13 199450
14 1993125
15 199284
16 199118
17
A monoclonal antibody to human blood group B. Performance, evaluation and optimisation.
19843
18 19832
19 197936
20 197949

About Alan G. Scott

Alan G. Scott is a scholar working on Microbiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Hematology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (12 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (5 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (4 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers), Insects and Parasite Interactions (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (3 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (717 citations), Insect Science (376 citations), Microbiology (89 citations), Genetics (321 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (159 citations). Alan G. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Hanne Duve, Alan Thorpe, Anders H. Johnsen, José L. Maestro, Philip S. Rainbow, Peter D. East, Geoff Oxford, Paul A. Selden, Robin Whelpton and Adina T. Michael‐Titus. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Biochemistry, Regulatory Peptides, Marine Biology, Peptides and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026