Alan Booth
Impact in
- Demography top 0.5%
- Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Papers in
-
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving 5
-
- Family Dynamics and Relationships 5
- Co-authors
- Paul R. Amato (3 shared papers)Laura Spencer Loomis (2 shared papers)Douglas A. Granger (3 shared papers)David Read Johnson (3 shared papers)Matthew Arentz (1 shared paper)Eve B. Schwartz (1 shared paper)David R. Johnson (2 shared papers)Jeremy B. Yorgason (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Social Forces (6 papers)Phoenix (5 papers)The Economic History Review (2 papers)American Sociological Review (1 paper)Research on Aging (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Alan Booth
28 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Demography 549
- Gender Studies 229
- Behavioral Neuroscience 82
- Health 118
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 198
Countries citing papers authored by Alan Booth
This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Booth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alan Booth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Booth. The network helps show where Alan Booth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Alan Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 276 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 207 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 181 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 155 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 87 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 86 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 85 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 61 | |
| 9 | 1975 | 45 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 43 | |
| 11 | 1989 | 32 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 32 | |
| 13 | 1970 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 15 | |
| 15 | 1979 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 14 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1979 | 11 | |
| 19 | The management of technical change : automation in the UK and USA since 1950 | 2007 | 10 |
| 20 | 1982 | 10 |
About Alan Booth
Alan Booth is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Anthropology, Philosophy and Gender Studies, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Dynamics and Relationships (5 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (5 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers) and Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (549 citations), Gender Studies (229 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (82 citations), Health (118 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (198 citations). Alan Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul R. Amato, Laura Spencer Loomis, Douglas A. Granger, David Read Johnson, Matthew Arentz, Eve B. Schwartz, David R. Johnson, Jeremy B. Yorgason, M. G. R. Cannell and J. Grace. Their work appears in journals such as Social Forces, Phoenix, The Economic History Review, American Sociological Review and Research on Aging.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.