Aimee Hungerford

42 papers receiving 968 citations

Peers

Aimee Hungerford
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 840
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 423
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 75
  • Radiation 49
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 45
Replace Joachim Trümper with:
Joachim Trümper Germany
Adam Foster United States
Mark Hurwitz United States
R. Sunyaev Russia
R. Petre United States
Kurt P. Jaehnig United States
R. L. Porter United States
James C. Lombardi United States
J. Englhauser Germany
Z. Meisel United States
Aimee Hungerford relative to Joachim Trümper Germany Joachim Trümper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.2×
Joachim Trümper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Aimee Hungerford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aimee Hungerford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aimee Hungerford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aimee Hungerford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aimee Hungerford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aimee Hungerford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aimee Hungerford. The network helps show where Aimee Hungerford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aimee Hungerford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aimee Hungerford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aimee Hungerford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aimee Hungerford. Aimee Hungerford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 10
2 6
3 73
4 37
5 1
6
Astrophysical Radionuclides: Where are they and what can they tell us?
0
7
MMA SAG: Thermonuclear Supernovae
0
8 5
9 23
10 1
11
The Los Alamos Supernova Light Curve Project
0
12 1
13 0
14 1
15 1
16 1
17
Pole Star: An 810 GHz Array Receiver for AST/RO
8
18
Pole STAR: An 810 GHz Array Receiver for AST/RO
6
19 5
20
LASER MICROMACHINING OF SILICON: A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR FABRICATING HIGH QUALITY TERAHERTZ WAVEGUIDE COMPONENTS'
28

About Aimee Hungerford

Aimee Hungerford is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Radiation, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (28 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (15 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (840 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (423 citations) and Instrumentation (38 citations). Aimee Hungerford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Chris L. Fryer, Christopher J. Fontes, Ryan Wollaeger, Oleg Korobkin, Patrick Young, Wesley Even, F. X. Timmes, Gabriel Rockefeller, Stephan Rosswog and M. Wiescher. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026