Jonah Miller

957 citations
32 papers · 566 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jonah Miller

26 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers

Jonah Miller
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 401
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 181
  • Computational Mathematics 2
  • Instrumentation 10
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 68
Replace Kazunori Akiyama with:
Kazunori Akiyama Japan
James N. Imamura United States
Shivani Bhandari Australia
H. Grote United Kingdom
F. Piacentini Italy
F. Salemi Italy
Aritra Banerjee India
A. V. Gordeev Russia
Vladimir Kouprianov United States
J. Ferreira France
Jonah Miller relative to Kazunori Akiyama Japan Kazunori Akiyama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Kazunori Akiyama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonah Miller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonah Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonah Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonah Miller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonah Miller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonah Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonah Miller. The network helps show where Jonah Miller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonah Miller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonah Miller Line = papers co-authored together Jonah Miller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019117
2 201784
3 202177
4 201252
5 202037
6 202226
7 202023
8 202220
9 201920
10 202316
11 202415
12 202410
13 201910
14 201410
15 20238
16 20247
17 20256
18 20226
19 20254
20 20244

About Jonah Miller

Jonah Miller is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (17 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (16 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (11 papers), Model Reduction and Neural Networks (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Color perception and design (2 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (2 papers) and Neutrino Physics Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (401 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (181 citations), Computational Mathematics (2 citations), Instrumentation (10 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (68 citations). Jonah Miller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jonas Lippuner, Matthew R. Mumpower, Chris L. Fryer, Christopher J. Fontes, Ryan Wollaeger, Oleg Korobkin, T. R. Schibli, C.-C. Lee, Benjamin R. Ryan and Joshua C. Dolence. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Journal of Computational Physics and Classical and Quantum Gravity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact