E. A. Chase

1.2k total citations
10 papers, 272 citations indexed

About

E. A. Chase is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, E. A. Chase has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 272 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 2 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in E. A. Chase's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (9 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (8 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (4 papers). E. A. Chase is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (9 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (8 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (4 papers). E. A. Chase collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. E. A. Chase's co-authors include Chris L. Fryer, Oleg Korobkin, Ryan Wollaeger, Christopher J. Fontes, Aimee Hungerford, C. Pankow, E. Troja, S. Vitale, V. Raymond and T. B. Littenberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

E. A. Chase

9 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
E. A. Chase United States	8	268	74	38	28	9	10	272
Alexandre Toubiana Germany	12	296 1.1×	79 1.1×	18 0.5×	27 1.0×	16 1.8×	18	316
S. M. Gaebel United Kingdom	4	455 1.7×	53 0.7×	23 0.6×	14 0.5×	6 0.7×	4	471
Chad Hanna Canada	5	237 0.9×	38 0.5×	33 0.9×	36 1.3×	7 0.8×	6	239
S. Biscoveanu United States	11	289 1.1×	48 0.6×	31 0.8×	27 1.0×	3 0.3×	19	301
S. J. Zhu Germany	7	198 0.7×	77 1.0×	46 1.2×	44 1.6×	13 1.4×	13	206
I. Magaña Hernandez United States	8	282 1.1×	49 0.7×	14 0.4×	29 1.0×	5 0.6×	13	286
S. Banagiri United States	10	176 0.7×	29 0.4×	26 0.7×	34 1.2×	9 1.0×	17	188
Kiranjyot Gill United States	6	220 0.8×	97 1.3×	26 0.7×	12 0.4×	27 3.0×	7	233
Matthew Mould United Kingdom	11	293 1.1×	53 0.7×	35 0.9×	20 0.7×	4 0.4×	22	312
M. Chan United Kingdom	7	229 0.9×	52 0.7×	40 1.1×	17 0.6×	21 2.3×	13	241

Countries citing papers authored by E. A. Chase

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. A. Chase's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. A. Chase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. A. Chase more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. A. Chase

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. A. Chase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. A. Chase. The network helps show where E. A. Chase may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. A. Chase

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. A. Chase. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. A. Chase based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. A. Chase. E. A. Chase is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Chen, Hsin-Yu, C. Talbot, & E. A. Chase. (2024). Mitigating the Counterpart Selection Effect for Standard Sirens. Physical Review Letters. 132(19). 191003–191003. 5 indexed citations

2.

O’Shaughnessy, R., A. B. Yelikar, Ryan Wollaeger, et al.. (2023). Surrogate light curve models for kilonovae with comprehensive wind ejecta outflows and parameter estimation for AT2017gfo. Physical Review Research. 5(1). 10 indexed citations

3.

Chase, E. A., Brendan O’Connor, Chris L. Fryer, et al.. (2022). Kilonova Detectability with Wide-field Instruments. The Astrophysical Journal. 927(2). 163–163. 41 indexed citations

4.

Champion, E., R. O’Shaughnessy, Ryan Wollaeger, et al.. (2022). Interpolating detailed simulations of kilonovae: Adaptive learning and parameter inference applications. Physical Review Research. 4(1). 16 indexed citations

5.

Korobkin, Oleg, Ryan Wollaeger, Chris L. Fryer, et al.. (2021). Axisymmetric Radiative Transfer Models of Kilonovae. The Astrophysical Journal. 910(2). 116–116. 73 indexed citations

6.

Dichiara, S., R. L. Becerra, E. A. Chase, et al.. (2021). Constraints on the Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Neutron-star–Black-hole Merger GW200115. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 923(2). L32–L32. 16 indexed citations

7.

Troja, E., E. A. Chase, Geoffrey Ryan, et al.. (2021). OUP accepted manuscript. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 32 indexed citations

8.

Pankow, C., Katerina Chatziioannou, E. A. Chase, et al.. (2018). Mitigation of the instrumental noise transient in gravitational-wave data surrounding GW170817. Physical Review Letters.

9.

Pankow, C., Katerina Chatziioannou, E. A. Chase, et al.. (2018). Mitigation of the instrumental noise transient in gravitational-wave data surrounding GW170817. Physical review. D. 98(8). 67 indexed citations

10.

Pankow, C., E. A. Chase, S. B. Coughlin, M. Zevin, & V. Kalogera. (2018). Improvements in Gravitational-wave Sky Localization with Expanded Networks of Interferometers. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 854(2). L25–L25. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact