A.H. Tulusan
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Gϋnter von MinckwitzSerban Dan CostaManfred KaufmannJens‐Uwe BlohmerW. EiermannChristian JackischLuca GianniPhilippe Beuzeboc
- Topics
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (10 papers)Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (6 papers)Cancer Cells and Metastasis (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
A.H. Tulusan
17 papers receiving 615 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Cancer Research 452
- Oncology 387
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 210
- Surgery 96
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 84
Countries citing papers authored by A.H. Tulusan
This map shows the geographic impact of A.H. Tulusan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.H. Tulusan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.H. Tulusan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A.H. Tulusan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.H. Tulusan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.H. Tulusan. The network helps show where A.H. Tulusan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A.H. Tulusan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A.H. Tulusan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A.H. Tulusan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A.H. Tulusan. A.H. Tulusan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 265 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 47 | |
| 6 | 119 | |
| 7 | Prognostic value of S-phase fraction in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas and nodal negative breast carcinomas. | 6 |
| 8 | Expression of oncogenes in human breast cancer specimens. | 21 |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | [Ductal carcinoma in situ: steroid receptors and proliferation kinetics]. | 1 |
| 11 | Resection guided by antibodies (REGAJ): a diagnostic procedure during second-look operation in ovarian cancer patients. | 10 |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | [Proceedings: Activity of non-specific pulmonary esterase following artificial fat embolism. Histo- and ultrahistochemical studies]. | 1 |
About A.H. Tulusan
A.H. Tulusan is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 637 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (10 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (6 papers) and Cancer Cells and Metastasis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (452 citations), Oncology (387 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (210 citations). A.H. Tulusan has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Gϋnter von Minckwitz, Serban Dan Costa, Manfred Kaufmann, Jens‐Uwe Blohmer, W. Eiermann, Christian Jackisch, Luca Gianni, Philippe Beuzeboc, Roy E. Smith and Vicente Valero. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, European Journal of Cancer and The Oncologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.