J.L. Achard
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- P. CholletJ DauplatG. Le BouëdecH. CuréFrédérique Penault‐LlorcaFabrice KwiatkowskiV. FeillelMarie‐Ange Mouret‐Reynier
- Topics
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (13 papers)Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (8 papers)Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesLuxembourg
In The Last Decade
J.L. Achard
30 papers receiving 616 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Cancer Research 398
- Oncology 304
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 206
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 113
- Surgery 106
Countries citing papers authored by J.L. Achard
This map shows the geographic impact of J.L. Achard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.L. Achard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.L. Achard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J.L. Achard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.L. Achard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.L. Achard. The network helps show where J.L. Achard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.L. Achard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.L. Achard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.L. Achard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.L. Achard. J.L. Achard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 51 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 76 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | [Ovarian transposition by laparoscopy in young women before curietherapy for cervical cancer]. | 4 |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 57 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 40 | |
| 18 | [Epithelial cancer of the ovary. Contribution of the experiences of a treatment facility to the current data of prognosis and treatment]. | 2 |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About J.L. Achard
J.L. Achard is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Research and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 630 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (13 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (8 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (398 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (113 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (206 citations). J.L. Achard has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Luxembourg. Frequent co-authors include P. Chollet, J Dauplat, G. Le Bouëdec, H. Curé, Frédérique Penault‐Llorca, Fabrice Kwiatkowski, V. Feillel, Marie‐Ange Mouret‐Reynier, Pierre Gimbergues and Pierre Verrelle. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, British Journal of Cancer and European Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.