Adrian Freeman

795 total citations
22 papers, 554 citations indexed

About

Adrian Freeman is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Adrian Freeman has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 554 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 11 papers in Family Practice and 7 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Adrian Freeman's work include Innovations in Medical Education (18 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (11 papers) and Radiology practices and education (7 papers). Adrian Freeman is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (18 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (11 papers) and Radiology practices and education (7 papers). Adrian Freeman collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Adrian Freeman's co-authors include Cees van der Vleuten, Chris Ricketts, Arno Muijtjens, Lee Coombes, Zineb Miriam Nouns, Richard Wakeford, Dario Torre, Sylvia Heeneman, Tim Wilkinson and Luke Dawson and has published in prestigious journals such as Medical Education, Medical Teacher and BMC Medical Education.

In The Last Decade

Adrian Freeman

21 papers receiving 540 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Adrian Freeman United Kingdom 13 435 256 173 130 76 22 554
Lee Coombes United Kingdom 14 341 0.8× 141 0.6× 104 0.6× 75 0.6× 84 1.1× 25 485
Kathleen Z. Holtzman United States 13 289 0.7× 115 0.4× 62 0.4× 73 0.6× 43 0.6× 18 369
Laura April McEwen Canada 12 244 0.6× 116 0.5× 74 0.4× 57 0.4× 88 1.2× 24 343
N. S. Paget Australia 11 199 0.5× 90 0.4× 76 0.4× 47 0.4× 80 1.1× 20 348
Leslie Flynn Canada 9 239 0.5× 80 0.3× 56 0.3× 46 0.4× 160 2.1× 21 379
Giulia Bonaminio United States 8 275 0.6× 83 0.3× 110 0.6× 38 0.3× 87 1.1× 36 440
Maggie Bartlett United Kingdom 11 290 0.7× 141 0.6× 62 0.4× 57 0.4× 100 1.3× 25 351
J M Laidlaw United Kingdom 7 281 0.6× 108 0.4× 87 0.5× 67 0.5× 108 1.4× 17 357
A I Rothman Canada 12 245 0.6× 127 0.5× 43 0.2× 53 0.4× 78 1.0× 36 344
Elizabeth Bradley United States 11 176 0.4× 52 0.2× 115 0.7× 32 0.2× 71 0.9× 29 335

Countries citing papers authored by Adrian Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adrian Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adrian Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adrian Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adrian Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adrian Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adrian Freeman. The network helps show where Adrian Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adrian Freeman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adrian Freeman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adrian Freeman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adrian Freeman. Adrian Freeman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Collares, Carlos Fernando, et al.. (2024). Reliability, validity and acceptability of an online clinical reasoning simulator for medical students: An international pilot. Medical Teacher. 46(9). 1220–1227. 2 indexed citations
2.
Botan, Vanessa, Viet‐Hai Phung, Peter K. Cheung, et al.. (2023). Examiner perceptions of the MRCGP recorded consultation assessment for general practice licensing during COVID-19: cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education. 23(1). 65–65.
3.
Siriwardena, A Niroshan, et al.. (2023). Performance of ethnic minority versus White doctors in the MRCGP assessment 2016–2021: a cross-sectional study. British Journal of General Practice. 73(729). e284–e293. 5 indexed citations
4.
Botan, Vanessa, Viet‐Hai Phung, Peter K. Cheung, et al.. (2021). Candidate perceptions of the UK Recorded Consultation Assessment: cross-sectional data linkage study. Education for Primary Care. 33(1). 32–40. 5 indexed citations
5.
Torre, Dario, Neil Rice, Anna Ryan, et al.. (2021). Ottawa 2020 consensus statements for programmatic assessment – 2. Implementation and practice. Medical Teacher. 43(10). 1149–1160. 32 indexed citations
6.
Vleuten, Cees van der, et al.. (2020). COVID‐19 and programmatic assessment. The Clinical Teacher. 17(4). 420–422. 8 indexed citations
7.
Fletcher, Emily, John Campbell, Emma Pitchforth, et al.. (2020). Comparing international postgraduate training and healthcare context with the UK to streamline overseas GP recruitment: four case studies. BJGP Open. 4(3). bjgpopen20X101034–bjgpopen20X101034. 3 indexed citations
8.
Fletcher, Emily, Anna Sansom, Emma Pitchforth, et al.. (2019). Overseas GP recruitment: comparing international GP training with the UK and ensuring that registration standards and patient safety are maintained. BJGP Open. 3(2). bjgpopen18X101640–bjgpopen18X101640. 2 indexed citations
9.
Shulruf, Boaz, Lee Coombes, Arvin Damodaran, et al.. (2018). Cut-scores revisited: feasibility of a new method for group standard setting. BMC Medical Education. 18(1). 126–126. 3 indexed citations
10.
Vleuten, Cees van der, Adrian Freeman, & Carlos Fernando Collares. (2018). Progress test utopia. Perspectives on Medical Education. 7(2). 136–138. 22 indexed citations
11.
Freeman, Adrian, et al.. (2013). MRCGP CSA: are the examiners biased, favouring their own by sex, ethnicity, and degree source?. British Journal of General Practice. 63(616). e718–e725. 32 indexed citations
12.
Vleuten, Cees van der, et al.. (2012). A systemic framework for the progress test: Strengths, constraints and issues: AMEE Guide No. 71. Medical Teacher. 34(9). 683–697. 119 indexed citations
13.
Ricketts, Chris, et al.. (2010). Difficult decisions for progress testing: How much and how often?. Medical Teacher. 32(6). 513–515. 14 indexed citations
14.
Bennett, J. H., et al.. (2010). Adaptation of medical progress testing to a dental setting. Medical Teacher. 32(6). 500–502. 21 indexed citations
15.
Coombes, Lee, et al.. (2010). Beyond assessment: Feedback for individuals and institutions based on the progress test. Medical Teacher. 32(6). 486–490. 46 indexed citations
16.
Freeman, Adrian, Anthony Nicholls, Chris Ricketts, & Lee Coombes. (2010). Can we share questions? Performance of questions from different question banks in a single medical school. Medical Teacher. 32(6). 464–466. 12 indexed citations
17.
Freeman, Adrian, Cees van der Vleuten, Zineb Miriam Nouns, & Chris Ricketts. (2010). Progress testing internationally. Medical Teacher. 32(6). 451–455. 87 indexed citations
18.
Freeman, Adrian & Chris Ricketts. (2010). Choosing and designing knowledge assessments: Experience at a new medical school. Medical Teacher. 32(7). 578–581. 25 indexed citations
19.
Ricketts, Chris, Adrian Freeman, & Lee Coombes. (2009). Standard setting for progress tests: combining external and internal standards. Medical Education. 43(6). 589–593. 17 indexed citations
20.
Chamberlain, Suzanne, et al.. (2006). Innovative learning: employing medical students to write formative assessments. Medical Teacher. 28(7). 656–659. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lee Coombes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kathleen Z. Holtzman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Laura April McEwen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by N. S. Paget Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leslie Flynn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Giulia Bonaminio Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Maggie Bartlett Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J M Laidlaw Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A I Rothman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elizabeth Bradley
Rankless by CCL
2026