Adélia Mendes

27 papers receiving 580 citations

Peers

Adélia Mendes
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Transplantation 29
  • Dermatology 36
  • Hematology 42
  • Oncology 94
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 58
Replace David R. Taft with:
David R. Taft United States
Gustav Lehne Norway
Raffaella Franca Italy
Masaru Hasumi Japan
Gawain Williams United States
Eugene Scott Swenson United States
Ling Meng China
Shinji Kobuchi Japan
Gaëlle Noé France
Stephan A. Veltkamp Netherlands
Adélia Mendes relative to David R. Taft United States David R. Taft's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.5×
David R. Taft · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adélia Mendes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adélia Mendes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adélia Mendes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adélia Mendes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adélia Mendes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adélia Mendes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adélia Mendes. The network helps show where Adélia Mendes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adélia Mendes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Adélia Mendes Line = papers co-authored together Adélia Mendes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014110
2 201460
3 201456
4 201956
5 202254
6 199841
7 201429
8 201620
9 201319
10 200014
11 202313
12 201612
13 201812
14 202312
15 202011
16 202010
17 202410
18 20149
19 19998
20 20138

About Adélia Mendes

Adélia Mendes is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Transplantation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear Structure and Function (5 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (5 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (2 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (2 papers) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (29 citations), Dermatology (36 citations), Hematology (42 citations), Oncology (94 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (58 citations). Adélia Mendes has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Birthe Fahrenkrog, João Azevedo‐Silva, Paula Soares, João Carlos Fernandes, Manuel A. Sobrinho-Simões, Paula Boaventura, Rui Batısta, José Manuel Lopes, Mrinalini Honavar and Isabel Guimarães. Their work appears in journals such as Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Cells, European Journal of Endocrinology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact