Adam N. Pate

438 total citations
24 papers, 285 citations indexed

About

Adam N. Pate is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Adam N. Pate has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 285 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 8 papers in Education and 6 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Adam N. Pate's work include Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (5 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers). Adam N. Pate is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (5 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers). Adam N. Pate collaborates with scholars based in United States and Japan. Adam N. Pate's co-authors include David J. Caldwell, Amy M. Franks, Nalin Payakachat, T. Kristopher Harrell, Jeffrey Bratberg, Sujith Ramachandran, Daniel R. Malcom, Melissa S. Medina, Lauren S. Schlesselman and Jeff Cain and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy and American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

In The Last Decade

Adam N. Pate

22 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Adam N. Pate United States 10 84 83 77 64 39 24 285
John Rae Australia 10 81 1.0× 34 0.4× 35 0.5× 81 1.3× 76 1.9× 28 301
Monika S. Schuler United States 9 43 0.5× 57 0.7× 63 0.8× 92 1.4× 72 1.8× 26 281
Hsun‐Yu Chan Taiwan 12 74 0.9× 29 0.3× 193 2.5× 51 0.8× 75 1.9× 45 467
Kazuhiko Fujisaki Japan 10 94 1.1× 134 1.6× 59 0.8× 38 0.6× 96 2.5× 19 299
Lauren S. Schlesselman United States 13 38 0.5× 178 2.1× 164 2.1× 101 1.6× 149 3.8× 27 492
Regina Alves Portugal 9 70 0.8× 31 0.4× 67 0.9× 133 2.1× 56 1.4× 40 314
Fernando Urcola‐Pardo Spain 11 28 0.3× 41 0.5× 64 0.8× 46 0.7× 60 1.5× 30 265
Dolene Rossi Australia 9 20 0.2× 62 0.7× 57 0.7× 29 0.5× 89 2.3× 19 276
Susan M. Hunter Revell United States 10 28 0.3× 48 0.6× 95 1.2× 55 0.9× 129 3.3× 21 320
Fariba Haghani Iran 12 61 0.7× 89 1.1× 109 1.4× 71 1.1× 78 2.0× 55 342

Countries citing papers authored by Adam N. Pate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam N. Pate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam N. Pate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam N. Pate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam N. Pate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam N. Pate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam N. Pate. The network helps show where Adam N. Pate may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam N. Pate

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam N. Pate. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam N. Pate based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam N. Pate. Adam N. Pate is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pate, Adam N., et al.. (2024). Evaluating Perceptions of Test Anxiety Among Student Pharmacists and Faculty Members: A Pilot Study. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 88(8). 100737–100737. 1 indexed citations
3.
Pate, Adam N., et al.. (2023). Residency application content and considerations based on residency director review of a fictitious CV: What really matters?. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 80(17). 1147–1156. 1 indexed citations
4.
Kawaguchi‐Suzuki, Marina, Lindsey M. Childs‐Kean, Radhika Devraj, et al.. (2023). Guidance for Qualitative Research Manuscripts in Pharmacy Education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 87(7). 100089–100089. 7 indexed citations
5.
Ramachandran, Sujith, et al.. (2021). Pharmacists need to participate and pay closer attention to the Medicare for All discussion. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 61(4). e225–e229. 1 indexed citations
6.
Pate, Adam N., et al.. (2020). Multisite Study Assessing the Effect of Cognitive Test Anxiety on Academic and Standardized Test Performance. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 85(1). 8041–8041. 13 indexed citations
7.
Malcom, Daniel R., et al.. (2020). Applying safety lessons from aviation to pre-licensure health professions education: A narrative critical review. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 12(8). 1028–1035. 4 indexed citations
8.
Payakachat, Nalin, et al.. (2020). Exploring factors associated with scholarly writing among US pharmacy practice faculty. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 17(3). 531–540. 2 indexed citations
9.
Pate, Adam N., et al.. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 Through the Eyes of a Fourth-Year Pharmacy Student. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 84(6). ajpe8146–ajpe8146. 22 indexed citations
10.
Pate, Adam N., et al.. (2019). The use of exam wrappers to promote metacognition. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 11(5). 492–498. 13 indexed citations
11.
Pate, Adam N., et al.. (2018). Are fishbowl activities effective for teaching pharmacotherapy and developing postformal thought in pharmacy students? A pilot study. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 10(8). 1070–1075. 8 indexed citations
12.
Pate, Adam N., et al.. (2017). Development, implementation, and impact of a collaborative junior faculty engagement and professional growth program: The Young Faculty Leadership Initiative. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 10(3). 352–359. 10 indexed citations
13.
Pate, Adam N., et al.. (2017). Measurement of Grit and Correlation to Student Pharmacist Academic Performance. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 81(6). 105–105. 77 indexed citations
14.
Pate, Adam N., et al.. (2016). Evaluation of a Tabletop Emergency Preparedness Exercise for Pharmacy Students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 80(3). 50–50. 23 indexed citations
15.
Caldwell, David J., et al.. (2015). Collaborative Examination Item Review Process in a Team-Taught, Self-Care Sequence. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 79(6). 87–87. 3 indexed citations
16.
Pate, Adam N.. (2015). Is It Time to Decrease Preprofessional Pharmacy Requirements?. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 79(8). 110–110. 8 indexed citations
17.
Pate, Adam N. & David J. Caldwell. (2013). Effects of multiple-choice item-writing guideline utilization on item and student performance. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 6(1). 130–134. 17 indexed citations
18.
Caldwell, David J. & Adam N. Pate. (2013). Effects of Question Formats on Student and Item Performance. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 77(4). 71–71. 22 indexed citations
19.
Caldwell, David J., et al.. (2013). An Elective Course on Application of Clinical Pharmacy Principles. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 77(10). 216–216. 7 indexed citations
20.
Payakachat, Nalin, et al.. (2011). Emergency contraception counseling: An opportunity for pharmacists. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 51(6). 756–761. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026