Adam M. Chekroud

4.8k citations
38 papers · 2.8k indexed · 4 hit papers · h-index 20

Adam M. Chekroud

34 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

Illusory genera...1112016202620192022200400600

Peers

Adam M. Chekroud
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Applied Psychology 400
  • Health Informatics 97
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 859
  • Biological Psychiatry 158
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 629
Replace Isaac R. Galatzer‐Levy with:
Isaac R. Galatzer‐Levy United States
Ioana A. Cristea Italy
Zachary D. Cohen United States
Caroline Figueroa Netherlands
Nicholas C. Jacobson United States
Dominic Dwyer Australia
Mark A. Reger United States
Klaas J. Wardenaar Netherlands
Caroline Park Canada
Kai Yuan China
Adam M. Chekroud relative to Isaac R. Galatzer‐Levy United States Isaac R. Galatzer‐Levy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Isaac R. Galatzer‐Levy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adam M. Chekroud

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam M. Chekroud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam M. Chekroud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam M. Chekroud more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam M. Chekroud

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam M. Chekroud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam M. Chekroud. The network helps show where Adam M. Chekroud may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adam M. Chekroud, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Adam M. Chekroud Line = papers co-authored together Adam M. Chekroud links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20260
2 20252
3 20251
4 20250
5 20250
6 20250
7 20257
8
Illusory generalizability of clinical prediction modelsbreakdown →
2024111
9 20231
10 20215
11 202042
12 2020106
13 2019103
14 201916
15 201843
16 2017176
17 201748
18 2017192
19
Cross-trial prediction of treatment outcome in depression: a machine learning approachbreakdown →
2016452
20 201455

About Adam M. Chekroud

Adam M. Chekroud is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and General Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (12 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (11 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (9 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (8 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (6 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers) and Machine Learning in Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (400 citations), Health Informatics (97 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (859 citations). Adam M. Chekroud has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John H. Krystal, Ralitza Gueorguieva, Harlan M. Krumholz, Martin P. Paulus, Amanda B. Zheutlin, Sammi R. Chekroud, Madhukar H. Trivedi, Philip R. Corlett, Tyrone D. Cannon and Marcia K. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Neuron.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026