Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by A. van Schoonhoven
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of A. van Schoonhoven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. van Schoonhoven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. van Schoonhoven more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. van Schoonhoven
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. van Schoonhoven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. van Schoonhoven. The network helps show where A. van Schoonhoven may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. van Schoonhoven
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. van Schoonhoven.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. van Schoonhoven based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. van Schoonhoven. A. van Schoonhoven is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schoonhoven, A. van, et al.. (2005). Riqueza del complejo chisa (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae) en cuatro agroecosistemas del Cauca, Colombia. Acta Agronómica. 54(4). 25–32.1 indexed citations
2.
White, John W., Satnam Singh, A. van Schoonhoven, & O. Voysest. (1991). Breeding for adaptation to drought.. 501–560.64 indexed citations
3.
Davis, J. H. C., et al.. (1991). The agronomy of intercropping with beans.. 707–735.18 indexed citations
Schoonhoven, A. van & Pastor-Corrales. (1987). Standard system for the evaluation of bean germplasm.350 indexed citations
6.
Fernández, F., et al.. (1985). Frijol: Investigacion y produccion. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).1 indexed citations
7.
Schoonhoven, A. van, Guy J. Hallman, & S.R. Temple. (1985). Breeding for resistance to Empoasca kraemeri Ross and Moore in Phaseolus vulgaris L. 405–422.7 indexed citations
Schoonhoven, A. van, et al.. (1981). Levels of resistance to the Mexican bean weevil, Zabrotes subfasciatus (Boheman) in cultivated and wild beans.. Revista Colombiana de Entomología. 7. 41–45.6 indexed citations
Bellotti, Anthony C. & A. van Schoonhoven. (1978). Plagas de la yuca y su control. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).2 indexed citations
13.
Schwartz, Howard F., et al.. (1978). Field problems of beans in Latin America. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).5 indexed citations
14.
Bellotti, Anthony & A. van Schoonhoven. (1978). Mite and Insect Pests of Cassava. Annual Review of Entomology. 23(1). 39–67.75 indexed citations
Bellotti, Anthony C. & A. van Schoonhoven. (1978). Cassava pests and their control. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.