Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Earth microbial co-occurrence network reveals interconnection pattern across microbiomes
2020388 citationsJack A. Gilbert, César Cardona et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of César Cardona's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by César Cardona with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites César Cardona more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by César Cardona. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by César Cardona. The network helps show where César Cardona may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of César Cardona
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of César Cardona.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of César Cardona based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with César Cardona. César Cardona is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cardona, César, et al.. (1998). Economic importance of the leafminer Liriomyza sativae (Diptera: Agromyzidae) as a pest of beans in the Valle del Cauca.. Revista Colombiana de Entomología. 24. 49–53.1 indexed citations
15.
Singh, Sube, César Cardona, Fermı́n Morales, Pastor-Corrales, & O. Voysest. (1996). Gamete selection for upright carioca beans with resistance to leafhopper and four diseases. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).1 indexed citations
16.
Cardona, César, et al.. (1993). Enzymatic resistance to insecticides in larvae of Heliothis virescens (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Revista Colombiana de Entomología. 19(4). 131–138.2 indexed citations
17.
Harmsen, R., F. A. Bliss, César Cardona, Carmen E. Posso, & T. C. Osborn. (1988). Transferring genes for arcelin protein from wild to cultivated beans: implications for bruchid resistance. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research). 31. 54–55.6 indexed citations
18.
Sithanantham, S. & César Cardona. (1984). A Pilot Survey for Pest Damage in Chickpeas in Jordan and Syria. Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics). 20–22.1 indexed citations
19.
Schoonhoven, A. van, et al.. (1981). Levels of resistance to the Mexican bean weevil, Zabrotes subfasciatus (Boheman) in cultivated and wild beans.. Revista Colombiana de Entomología. 7. 41–45.6 indexed citations
20.
Cardona, César, et al.. (1978). Problemas de campo en los cultivos de fríjol en América Latina.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.