Peter H. Graham

608 total citations
20 papers, 381 citations indexed

About

Peter H. Graham is a scholar working on Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter H. Graham has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 381 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Plant Science, 11 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 2 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in Peter H. Graham's work include Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (16 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (11 papers) and Nematode management and characterization studies (5 papers). Peter H. Graham is often cited by papers focused on Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (16 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (11 papers) and Nematode management and characterization studies (5 papers). Peter H. Graham collaborates with scholars based in United States, Colombia and Uruguay. Peter H. Graham's co-authors include Craig C. Sheaffer, Michael P. Russelle, Julie Grossman, Nancy Ehlke, Philippe Séguin, Carroll P. Vance, Deborah L. Allan, Diane L. Larson, David Espinosa‐Victoria and Patrick J. Breen and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Plant and Soil and Field Crops Research.

In The Last Decade

Peter H. Graham

19 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter H. Graham United States	11	343	210	54	35	26	20	381
Jake Halliday Australia	9	173 0.5×	80 0.4×	44 0.8×	29 0.8×	42 1.6×	11	228
T. A. Lie Netherlands	14	677 2.0×	358 1.7×	40 0.7×	47 1.3×	27 1.0×	34	713
S. U. Remison Nigeria	10	262 0.8×	199 0.9×	81 1.5×	20 0.6×	12 0.5×	46	400
R. M. Greenwood Australia	11	296 0.9×	154 0.7×	53 1.0×	66 1.9×	34 1.3×	16	356
D. G. Robertson Belize	14	410 1.2×	125 0.6×	30 0.6×	33 0.9×	15 0.6×	45	487
Clare Murphy Australia	7	380 1.1×	269 1.3×	63 1.2×	13 0.4×	49 1.9×	9	442
Gwynneth Fellowes Hungary	6	360 1.0×	250 1.2×	43 0.8×	17 0.5×	26 1.0×	6	394
P. R. Carter United States	9	234 0.7×	338 1.6×	116 2.1×	19 0.5×	21 0.8×	11	435
B. Verbeek Australia	6	572 1.7×	449 2.1×	61 1.1×	12 0.3×	25 1.0×	8	607
Melinda L. Hoffman United States	9	297 0.9×	141 0.7×	74 1.4×	14 0.4×	42 1.6×	11	338

Countries citing papers authored by Peter H. Graham

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter H. Graham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter H. Graham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter H. Graham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter H. Graham

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter H. Graham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter H. Graham. The network helps show where Peter H. Graham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter H. Graham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter H. Graham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter H. Graham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter H. Graham. Peter H. Graham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Larson, Diane L., et al.. (2013). Legumes in prairie restoration: evidence for wide cross-nodulation and improved inoculant delivery. Plant and Soil. 377(1-2). 245–258. 14 indexed citations

Grossman, Julie, et al.. (2004). Selection of rhizobia for prairie legumes used in restoration and reconstruction programs in Minnesota. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 50(11). 977–983. 35 indexed citations

Sheaffer, Craig C., et al.. (2004). Dinitrogen Fixation in Illinois Bundleflower. Crop Science. 44(2). 493–500. 10 indexed citations

Séguin, Philippe, Craig C. Sheaffer, Nancy Ehlke, Michael P. Russelle, & Peter H. Graham. (2001). Nitrogen Fertilization and Rhizobial Inoculation Effects on Kura Clover Growth. Agronomy Journal. 93(6). 1262–1268. 22 indexed citations

Espinosa‐Victoria, David, et al.. (2000). Host Variation in Traits Associated with Crown Nodule Senescence in Soybean. Crop Science. 40(1). 103–109. 12 indexed citations

Séguin, Philippe, Michael P. Russelle, Craig C. Sheaffer, Nancy Ehlke, & Peter H. Graham. (2000). Dinitrogen Fixation in Kura Clover and Birdsfoot Trefoil. Agronomy Journal. 92(6). 1216–1220. 21 indexed citations

Zhu, Yanping, et al.. (1998). Inoculation and Nitrogen Affect Herbage and Symbiotic Properties of Annual Medicago Species. Agronomy Journal. 90(6). 781–786. 18 indexed citations

Graham, Peter H., et al.. (1998). Acidity and calcium interaction affecting cell envelope stability in <i>Rhizobium</i>. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 44(6). 582–587. 1 indexed citations

Graham, Peter H.. (1994). Biofertilizers in agriculture and forestry, Third edition. Field Crops Research. 39(1). 59–60.

10.

Graham, Peter H., et al.. (1992). Cultivar Variation in Traits Affecting Early Nodulation of Common Bean. Crop Science. 32(6). 1432–1436. 50 indexed citations

11.

Ayisi, Kingsley Kwabena, Daniel H. Putnam, Carroll P. Vance, & Peter H. Graham. (1992). Dinitrogen Fixation, Nitrogen and Dry Matter Accumulation, and Nodulation in White Lupine. Crop Science. 32(5). 1197–1202. 8 indexed citations

12.

Graham, Peter H., et al.. (1990). Competitive Ability and Efficiency in Nodule Formation of Strains of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 56(10). 3035–3039. 49 indexed citations

13.

Graham, Peter H., et al.. (1989). Cultivar and pH effects on competition for nodule sites between isolates of Rhizobium in beans. Plant and Soil. 117(2). 195–200. 48 indexed citations

14.

Graham, Peter H., et al.. (1988). Phaseolus vulgaris cultivar and Rhizobium strain variation in acid-pH tolerance and nodulation under acid conditions. Field Crops Research. 19(2). 91–101. 58 indexed citations

15.

Graham, Peter H.. (1984). Fertilization of dryland and irrigated soils. Field Crops Research. 9. 81–82. 3 indexed citations

16.

Graham, Peter H.. (1983). Fertilizers and fertilization. Field Crops Research. 7. 223–224. 8 indexed citations

17.

Graham, Peter H.. (1982). Plant factors affecting symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legumes. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research). 27–37. 3 indexed citations

18.

Breen, Patrick J., et al.. (1980). Translocation of 14C-photosynthate, Carbohydrate Content, and Nitrogen Fixation in Phaseolus vulgaris L. during Reproductive Development1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 105(3). 424–427. 14 indexed citations

19.

Graham, Peter H., et al.. (1980). The Effect of Rice-hull Mulch on Growth, Carbohydrate Content, and Nitrogen Fixation in Phaseolus vulgaris L.1. HortScience. 15(2). 138–140. 2 indexed citations

20.

Schwartz, Howard F., et al.. (1978). Field problems of beans in Latin America. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research). 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact