A. M. Viéitez

3.5k total citations
93 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

A. M. Viéitez is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, A. M. Viéitez has authored 93 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 82 papers in Molecular Biology, 61 papers in Plant Science and 42 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in A. M. Viéitez's work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (80 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (42 papers) and Seed Germination and Physiology (29 papers). A. M. Viéitez is often cited by papers focused on Plant tissue culture and regeneration (80 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (42 papers) and Seed Germination and Physiology (29 papers). A. M. Viéitez collaborates with scholars based in Spain, Russia and Sri Lanka. A. M. Viéitez's co-authors include Antonio Ballester, M. Carmen San José, Elena Corredoira, E. Vieitez, Conchi Sánchez, M. T. Martínez, Silvia Valladares, Nieves Vidal, B. Cuenca and Rubén Mallón and has published in prestigious journals such as Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Physiologia Plantarum and Tree Physiology.

In The Last Decade

A. M. Viéitez

91 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
A. M. Viéitez Spain	32	2.1k	1.8k	694	240	225	93	2.4k
Conchi Sánchez Spain	23	1.0k 0.5×	1.0k 0.6×	236 0.3×	120 0.5×	81 0.4×	62	1.3k
Carlos Romero Spain	24	1.1k 0.5×	1.6k 0.9×	172 0.2×	126 0.5×	397 1.8×	81	1.9k
Francis Zee United States	21	565 0.3×	1.2k 0.7×	184 0.3×	101 0.4×	159 0.7×	64	1.5k
Yasuhiko Mukai Japan	33	1.0k 0.5×	2.9k 1.6×	61 0.1×	35 0.1×	354 1.6×	91	3.3k
Catherine Feuillet France	38	1.4k 0.7×	4.4k 2.4×	190 0.3×	52 0.2×	162 0.7×	76	4.7k
R. M. Skirvin United States	22	1.3k 0.6×	1.2k 0.7×	286 0.4×	14 0.1×	122 0.5×	91	1.5k
Sami Jorge Michereff Brazil	24	582 0.3×	2.3k 1.3×	1.8k 2.6×	41 0.2×	167 0.7×	179	2.5k
Gaetano Distefano Italy	22	594 0.3×	902 0.5×	124 0.2×	41 0.2×	200 0.9×	75	1.1k
V. Rani India	10	743 0.3×	893 0.5×	151 0.2×	24 0.1×	128 0.6×	13	1.1k
Rohtas Singh India	10	516 0.2×	977 0.5×	98 0.1×	32 0.1×	178 0.8×	19	1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by A. M. Viéitez

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. M. Viéitez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. M. Viéitez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. M. Viéitez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. M. Viéitez

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. M. Viéitez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. M. Viéitez. The network helps show where A. M. Viéitez may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. M. Viéitez

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. M. Viéitez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. M. Viéitez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. M. Viéitez. A. M. Viéitez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Corredoira, Elena, Scott A. Merkle, M. T. Martínez, et al.. (2019). Non-Zygotic Embryogenesis in Hardwood Species. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 38(1). 29–97. 55 indexed citations

Corredoira, Elena, et al.. (2015). Induction of somatic embryogenesis in explants of shoot cultures established from adult Eucalyptus globulus and E. saligna x E. maidenii trees. Tree Physiology. 35(6). 678–690. 58 indexed citations

Mallón, Rubén, et al.. (2011). Improving secondary embryogenesis in Quercus robur: application of temporary immersion for mass propagation. Trees. 26(3). 731–741. 45 indexed citations

Viéitez, A. M., Elena Corredoira, M. T. Martínez, et al.. (2011). Application of biotechnological tools to Quercus improvement. European Journal of Forest Research. 131(3). 519–539. 53 indexed citations

Viéitez, A. M., M. Carmen San José, & Elena Corredoira. (2010). Cryopreservation of Zygotic Embryonic Axes and Somatic Embryos of European Chestnut. Methods in molecular biology. 710. 201–213. 12 indexed citations

José, M. Carmen San, Elena Corredoira, M. T. Martínez, et al.. (2010). Shoot apex explants for induction of somatic embryogenesis in mature Quercus robur L. trees. Plant Cell Reports. 29(6). 661–671. 42 indexed citations

Corredoira, Elena, Silvia Valladares, A. M. Viéitez, & Antonio Ballester. (2008). Improved germination of somatic embryos and plant recovery of European chestnut. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant. 44(4). 307–315. 25 indexed citations

Cuenca, B. & A. M. Viéitez. (2000). Influence of carbon source on shoot multiplication and adventitious bud regeneration in in vitro beech cultures. Plant Growth Regulation. 32(1). 1–12. 46 indexed citations

Sánchez, Conchi, M. Carmen San José, Antonio Ballester, & A. M. Viéitez. (1996). Requirements for in vitro rooting of Quercus robur and Q. rubra shoots derived from mature trees. Tree Physiology. 16(8). 673–680. 60 indexed citations

10.

Vidal, Nieves, et al.. (1994). Biochemical Characteristics of Chesnut Shoots Related to "in vitro" Multiplication and Rooting Capacities.. Advances in Horticultural Science. 1000–1006. 5 indexed citations

11.

José, M. Carmen San & A. M. Viéitez. (1992). Adventitious shoot regeneration fromin vitroleaves of adultCamellia reticulata. Journal of Horticultural Science. 67(5). 677–683. 4 indexed citations

12.

José, M. Carmen San, A. M. Viéitez, & A. Ballester. (1990). Clonal propagation of juvenile and adult trees of sessile oak by tissue culture techniques. Silvae genetica. 39(2). 50–55. 27 indexed citations

13.

Viéitez, A. M., et al.. (1990). Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from embryonic tissues ofCamellia japonica L.. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 21(3). 267–274. 39 indexed citations

14.

José, M. Carmen San, Antonio Ballester, & A. M. Viéitez. (1988). Factors affecting in vitro propagation of Quercus robur L.. Tree Physiology. 4(3). 281–290. 41 indexed citations

15.

Viéitez, A. M., et al.. (1986). Changes in auxin protectors and IAA oxidases during the rooting of chestnut shoots in vitro. Physiologia Plantarum. 66(3). 491–494. 27 indexed citations

16.

Viéitez, A. M., M. Carmen San José, & E. Vieitez. (1985). In vitroplantlet regeneration from juvenile and matureQuercus robur, L.. Journal of Horticultural Science. 60(1). 99–106. 72 indexed citations

17.

Viéitez, A. M., et al.. (1985). Somatic embryogenesis from chestnut cotyledon tissue cultured in vitro. Scientia Horticulturae. 27(1-2). 97–103. 13 indexed citations

18.

Viéitez, A. M., et al.. (1984). In Vitro Propagation of Camellia japonica Seedlings. HortScience. 19(2). 225–226. 17 indexed citations

19.

Ballester, A., A. M. Viéitez, & E. Vieitez. (1982). Allelopathic potential ofErica vagans, calluna vulgaris, andDaboecia cantabrica. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 8(5). 851–857. 31 indexed citations

20.

Viéitez, A. M., Antonio Ballester, & E. Vieitez. (1975). Coniferyl alcohol from callus ofCastanea sativa cultured in vitro. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 31(10). 1163–1164.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact