A Jabor

2.9k citations
95 papers · 2.1k indexed · h-index 22

A Jabor

89 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

A Jabor
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Nephrology 713
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 607
  • Reproductive Medicine 453
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 336
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 315
Replace Carlo Donadio with:
Carlo Donadio Italy
Sun Moon Kim South Korea
G Mecca Italy
Kazumi Taguchi Japan
Nüket Bavbek Türkiye
J. W. J. van Wersch Netherlands
Alexander Kainz Austria
Hilmi Umut Ünal Türkiye
Murat Duranay Türkiye
Andrea Mari Italy
A Jabor relative to Carlo Donadio Italy Carlo Donadio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.8×
Carlo Donadio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A Jabor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A Jabor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Jabor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Jabor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A Jabor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A Jabor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A Jabor. The network helps show where A Jabor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A Jabor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A Jabor Line = papers co-authored together A Jabor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202421
2 20215
3 20216
4 202111
5 20191
6 20190
7 201833
8 20183
9
[The common position of the Czech professional associations on the consensus of the European Atherosclerosis Society and the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine regarding investigation on blood lipids and interpretation of their levels].
20171
10 20170
11 20152
12 201555
13 201340
14 201156
15 20103
16 200958
17 200350
18 200111
19 2000294
20 19896

About A Jabor

A Jabor is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Nephrology, Transplantation and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 95 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (26 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (22 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (11 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (8 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (7 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (6 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (6 papers) and Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (713 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (607 citations), Reproductive Medicine (453 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (336 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (315 citations). A Jabor has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include A Kazda, Z Holub, James Figge, Vladimír Fencl, L Kliment, Josef Kautzner, Vojtěch Melenovský, Janka Franeková, William Marshall and P R Pannall. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), Clinica Chimica Acta, Blood Purification and Transplant Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026