Michael Conrad

5.6k citations
192 papers · 3.7k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Conrad

182 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Michael Conrad
Comparison fields: 5 of 187
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 527
  • Artificial Intelligence 884
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 404
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 381
  • History and Philosophy of Science 86
Replace Robert Rosén with:
Robert Rosén United States
Steen Rasmussen United States
Norman H. Packard United States
Walter Fontana United States
René Thom France
H. H. Pattee United States
David Williams United Kingdom
Chris Fields United States
D. Horn Israel
Léon Brillouin United States
Michael Conrad relative to Robert Rosén United States Robert Rosén's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Robert Rosén · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Conrad

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Conrad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Conrad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Conrad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Conrad

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Conrad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Conrad. The network helps show where Michael Conrad may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Conrad, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Conrad Line = papers co-authored together Michael Conrad links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 192 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979236
2 1987217
3 1984140
4 1990130
5 1981123
6 1985111
7 199081
8 197473
9 197468
10 198366
11 197060
12 199659
13 198357
14 197956
15 197251
16 199249
17 197948
18 198648
19 197947
20 199446

About Michael Conrad

Michael Conrad is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 192 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (30 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (25 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (18 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (18 papers), Origins and Evolution of Life (18 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (17 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (16 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (527 citations), Artificial Intelligence (884 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (404 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (381 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (86 citations). Michael Conrad has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include S. J. Singer, Peter Calow, Klaus‐Peter Zauner, Mateen M. Rizki, Petr Jarolı́m, E.A. Liberman, H. H. Pattee, Harold M. Hastings, Jong‐Chen Chen and W. Güttinger. Their work appears in journals such as Biosystems, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Chaos Solitons & Fractals and Applied Mathematics and Computation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact