Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Incidence of haematological malignancy by sub-type: a report from the Haematological Malignancy Research Network
2011486 citationsA. G. Smith, Debra Howell et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A. G. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. G. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. G. Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. G. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. G. Smith. The network helps show where A. G. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. G. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. G. Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. G. Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. G. Smith. A. G. Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smith, A. G., A. Pontefract, Mark J. Brown, et al.. (2016). SETG: Nucleic Acid Extraction and Sequencing for In Situ Life Detection on Mars. LPICo. 1980. 4095.2 indexed citations
8.
Rigopoulou, D., R. Hopwood, G. Magdis, et al.. (2014). 中等度赤方偏移(超)-高輝度赤外線銀河における遠赤外線冷却線のHerschel観測. The Astrophysical Journal. 781. 1–15.4 indexed citations
Webb, J. R., D. M. Crenshaw, C. R. Shrader, et al.. (1991). UV-Optical Observations of the 1991 Outburst of 3C 345. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 23. 1420.2 indexed citations
12.
Smith, A. G., et al.. (1985). X-Ray films: suppression of reciprocity failure by astronomical techniques. 11(1). 27–32.3 indexed citations
13.
Webb, J. R., A. G. Smith, & R. J. Leacock. (1984). Effects of Optical Variability on X-ray Optical Correlations. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 16. 727.1 indexed citations
14.
Smith, A. G.. (1981). Constraints limiting the rate of human expansion into the Galaxy. JBIS. 34. 363–366.3 indexed citations
15.
Smith, A. G. & R. J. Leacock. (1973). Laboratory and sky tests of Kodak special plate, type 127-02, a new panchromatic version of the IIIa-J emulsion.. 7(7). 18–19.1 indexed citations
16.
Smith, A. G., et al.. (1971). Optical Identifications of Ohio Radio Sources with Peculiar Spectra. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 3. 24.2 indexed citations
17.
Carr, T. D., et al.. (1970). Twelve-Year Periodicities in Jupiter's Decametric Radiation. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 2. 186.1 indexed citations
18.
Smith, A. G., et al.. (1965). RADIO ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATIONS FROM A CANYON,. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).
Smith, A. G., et al.. (1963). RESULTS OF RECENT DECAMETER-WAVELENGTH OBSERVATIONS OF JUPITER. Annali Italiani di Chirurgia. 11. 543.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.