Daniel Scott

545 citations
27 papers · 378 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Scott

25 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers

Daniel Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Cancer Research 69
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 57
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 62
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 25
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 51
Replace Xu Han with:
Xu Han China
Yijun Bao China
Jack F.V. Hunt United States
Rita Daverio Italy
I. Cerillo Italy
Shannon Gallagher United States
Farnaz Hooshmand United States
Catherine Gentil France
K Kovács Hungary
Xudong Chen China
Daniel Scott relative to Xu Han China Xu Han's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Xu Han · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Scott. The network helps show where Daniel Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Scott Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199774
2 201151
3 200841
4 201437
5 201035
6 200727
7 200519
8 200918
9 201311
10 201410
11 201610
12 20108
13 20186
14 20205
15 20124
16 20194
17 20203
18 19703
19 20203
20 20213

About Daniel Scott

Daniel Scott is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 27 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (12 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (9 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (4 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (3 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (69 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (57 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (62 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (25 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (51 citations). Daniel Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Noboru Hiroi, Tatjana Stanković, C Warren, JM Varley, Erica Levine, Jim Heighway, J. Baker, Matthew Wyon, Katherine E. Watkins and Jane R. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Deviant Behavior, Journal of Youth Studies, British Journal of Cancer and Behavioural Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact