Work Employment and Society

2.2k papers and 58.1k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Work Employment and Society in the last decades have received a total of 58.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Work Employment and Society usually cover Sociology and Political Science (989 papers), General Health Professions (749 papers) and Public Administration (623 papers) specifically the topics of Employment and Welfare Studies (719 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (608 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (323 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Work Employment and Society are Bridget Anderson, Paul Thompson, Mike Noon, Sharon C. Bolton, Anna Pollert, Rosemary Crompton, Wolfgang Streeck, Michael Rose, Monder Ram and Ruth Simpson.

In The Last Decade

Work Employment and Society

1.8k papers receiving 49.8k citations

Fields of papers published in Work Employment and Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Work Employment and Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Work Employment and Society.

Countries where authors publish in Work Employment and Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Work Employment and Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Work Employment and Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Work Employment and Society more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026