Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Doing the Dirty Work? The Global Politics of Domestic Labour
Countries citing papers authored by Bridget Anderson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Bridget Anderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bridget Anderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bridget Anderson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bridget Anderson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bridget Anderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bridget Anderson. The network helps show where Bridget Anderson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bridget Anderson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bridget Anderson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bridget Anderson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bridget Anderson. Bridget Anderson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Osterman, Paul, Nichola Lowe, Bridget Anderson, et al.. (2022). A Forum on the Politics of Skills. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 75(5). 1348–1368.6 indexed citations
Anderson, Bridget, et al.. (2019). Working for benefits:Deservingness and discrimination in the British social security system. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).1 indexed citations
Picone, Michael D., Catherine Davies, Bridget Anderson, & Guy Bailey. (2015). New Perspectives on Language Variety in the South: Historical and Contemporary Approaches.20 indexed citations
Anderson, Bridget & Isabel Shutes. (2014). Migration and Care Labour: Theory, Policy and Politics.45 indexed citations
12.
Anderson, Bridget & Isabel Shutes. (2014). Migration and Care Labour. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks.39 indexed citations
13.
Anderson, Bridget, et al.. (2014). Needed Research on the Englishes of Appalachia. ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University). 30(1). 1.2 indexed citations
14.
Anderson, Bridget, Matthew J. Gibney, & Emanuela Paoletti. (2011). Introduction: Boundaries of belonging: deportation and the constitution and contestation of citizenship. Citizenship Studies. 543–545.2 indexed citations
15.
Anderson, Bridget, Matthew J. Gibney, & Emanuela Paoletti. (2011). Special Issue: Boundaries of Belonging: Deportation and the Constitution and Contestation of Citizenship. Citizenship Studies.2 indexed citations
Anderson, Bridget. (2003). An acoustic study of Southeastern Michigan Appalachian and African -American Southern migrant vowel systems.. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).13 indexed citations
20.
Anderson, Bridget. (1999). Source-language transfer and vowel accommodation in the patterning of Cherokee English /ai/ and /oi/. American Speech. 74(4). 339–368.16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.