Veterinary and Comparative Oncology

1.1k papers and 16.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology in the last decades have received a total of 16.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (861 papers), Small Animals (354 papers) and Genetics (268 papers) specifically the topics of Veterinary Oncology Research (828 papers), Infectious Diseases and Mycology (318 papers) and Virus-based gene therapy research (251 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology are David M. Vail, Douglas H. Thamm, Cheryl A. London, Karin U. Sørenmo, Deanna R. Worley, Rowan J. Milner, Laura Marconato, D. J. Argyle, David M. Lurie and Sandra Nguyen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology.

Countries where authors publish in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veterinary and Comparative Oncology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025