Veterinary Ophthalmology

2.0k papers and 26.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Veterinary Ophthalmology in the last decades have received a total of 26.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Veterinary Ophthalmology usually cover Ophthalmology (1.1k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (786 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (580 papers) specifically the topics of Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (551 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (549 papers) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (474 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Veterinary Ophthalmology are Kirk N. Gelatt, Richard R. Dubielzig, David L. Williams, Brian C. Gilger, Dennis E. Brooks, Edward O. MacKay, Caryn E. Plummer, Alexandra van der Woerdt, Eric C. Ledbetter and Gillian J. McLellan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Veterinary Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Veterinary Ophthalmology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Veterinary Ophthalmology.

Countries where authors publish in Veterinary Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Veterinary Ophthalmology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Veterinary Ophthalmology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veterinary Ophthalmology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025