Visual Anthropology Review

533 papers and 3.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 533 papers published in Visual Anthropology Review in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Visual Anthropology Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (162 papers), Anthropology (105 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (105 papers) specifically the topics of Geographies of human-animal interactions (98 papers), Photography and Visual Culture (83 papers) and Anthropological Studies and Insights (70 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Visual Anthropology Review are Stephanie Takaragawa, Mark Allen Peterson, Jay Ruby, Lisa M. Mitchell, Faye Ginsburg, Eric Gable, David MacDougall, Elizabeth Edwards, Terence Turner and Liam Buckley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Visual Anthropology Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Visual Anthropology Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Visual Anthropology Review.

Countries where authors publish in Visual Anthropology Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Visual Anthropology Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Visual Anthropology Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Visual Anthropology Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025