Countries where authors publish in Utopian Studies
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Utopian Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Utopian Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Utopian Studies more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Utopian Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Utopian Studies.
About Utopian Studies
The 732 papers published in Utopian Studies in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Utopian Studies usually cover Philosophy (214 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (89 papers), History (74 papers), Museology (22 papers) and Cultural Studies (51 papers) specifically the topics of Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (157 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (91 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (29 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (27 papers), Anarchism and Radical Politics (19 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (19 papers), Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation (19 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Utopian Studies are Lyman Tower Sargent, Raphael Sassower, Martin van Creveld, John R. Pfeiffer, Lucy Sargisson, Ruth Levitas, Patrick Parrinder, Darren Jorgensen, Jack Z. Bratich and William J. Mitchell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.