Utopian Studies

732 papers and 3.8k indexed citations

About

The 732 papers published in Utopian Studies in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Utopian Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (232 papers), Philosophy (214 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (89 papers) specifically the topics of Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (157 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (91 papers) and Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Utopian Studies are Lyman Tower Sargent, Raphael Sassower, Martin van Creveld, John R. Pfeiffer, Lucy Sargisson, Ruth Levitas, Patrick Parrinder, Darren Jorgensen, Jack Z. Bratich and William J. Mitchell.

In The Last Decade

Utopian Studies

328 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Countries where authors publish in Utopian Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Utopian Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Utopian Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Utopian Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Utopian Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Utopian Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Utopian Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026