Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis

266 papers and 422 indexed citations i.

About

The 266 papers published in Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis in the last decades have received a total of 422 indexed citations. Papers published in Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis usually cover Political Science and International Relations (84 papers), History (83 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (34 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Influence and Diplomacy (35 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (27 papers) and Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis are Hugo Soly, Antoon de Baets, Harry Oosterhuis, Willem Frijhoff, Gert Oostindië, J.L. van Zanden, Joost Jonker, Beatrice de Graaf, Rudolf Dekker and A.M. van der Woude.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis.

Countries where authors publish in Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025