Countries where authors publish in Tree Genetics & Genomes
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tree Genetics & Genomes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tree Genetics & Genomes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tree Genetics & Genomes more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Tree Genetics & Genomes
This network shows the impact of papers published in Tree Genetics & Genomes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tree Genetics & Genomes.
About Tree Genetics & Genomes
The 1.7k papers published in Tree Genetics & Genomes in the last decades have received a total of 40.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Tree Genetics & Genomes usually cover Horticulture (76 papers), Plant Science (984 papers), Endocrinology (113 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (257 papers) and Genetics (566 papers) specifically the topics of Genetic diversity and population structure (439 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (244 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (229 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (195 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (193 papers), Forest ecology and management (182 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (159 papers) and Plant Gene Expression Analysis (135 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tree Genetics & Genomes are Brad Potts, Dário Grattapaglia, Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende, David B. Neale, René E. Vaillancourt, Andrew J. Eckert, Albert G. Abbott, David Chagné, Outi Savolainen and Fabrizio Costa.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.