This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plant Methods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plant Methods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plant Methods more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Plant Methods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plant Methods.
About Plant Methods
The 1.7k papers published in Plant Methods in the last decades have received a total of 63.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Plant Methods usually cover Plant Science (536 papers), Molecular Biology (324 papers), Analytical Chemistry (53 papers), Biophysics (27 papers) and Ecology (69 papers) specifically the topics of Smart Agriculture and AI (214 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (112 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (66 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (45 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (38 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (37 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (34 papers) and Plant Molecular Biology Research (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plant Methods are Arthur Korte, Ashley Farlow, Jun Liu, Xuewei Wang, Roger P. Hellens, Achim Walter, De-Zhu Li, Andrew P. French, Rongmei Wu and Erika Varkonyi‐Gasic.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.