Traditiones
- Music top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Archeology
- Political Science and International Relations
- Literature and Literary Theory
- Topics
- Diverse Musicological StudiesBalkan and Eastern European StudiesBalkans: History, Politics, Society
In The Last Decade
Traditiones
270 papers receiving 630 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Music 221
- Sociology and Political Science 213
- Archeology 152
- Political Science and International Relations 103
- Literature and Literary Theory 103
Countries where authors publish in Traditiones
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Traditiones. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Traditiones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Traditiones more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Traditiones
This network shows the impact of papers published in Traditiones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Traditiones.
About Traditiones
The 392 papers published in Traditiones in the last decades have received a total of 832 indexed citations . Papers published in Traditiones usually cover Music (133 papers), Cultural Studies (64 papers) and Space and Planetary Science (9 papers) specifically the topics of Diverse Musicological Studies (128 papers), Balkan and Eastern European Studies (74 papers) and Balkans: History, Politics, Society (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Traditiones are Regina Bendix, Liisi Laineste, Dan Podjed, Máiréad Nic Craith, Csaba Mészáros, Primož Pipan, Laurent Sébastien Fournier, Katarina Polajnar Horvat, Gábor Barna and Peter Grzybek.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.