Translation Review

358 papers and 964 indexed citations

About

The 358 papers published in Translation Review in the last decades have received a total of 964 indexed citations. Papers published in Translation Review usually cover Language and Linguistics (95 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (53 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (22 papers) specifically the topics of Translation Studies and Practices (88 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (9 papers) and Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (8 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Translation Review are Rainer Schulte, Carol Maier, Katherine King, Michael Scott Doyle, Harry Aveling, José Ortéga y Gassét, Donald Frame, Marilyn Booth, Mary Jane White and Janis Forman.

In The Last Decade

Translation Review

98 papers receiving 256 citations

Countries where authors publish in Translation Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Translation Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Translation Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Translation Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Translation Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Translation Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Translation Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026