ACM Transactions on Information and System Security
About
In The Last Decade
ACM Transactions on Information and System Security
312 papers receiving 15.0k citations
Fields of papers published in ACM Transactions on Information and System Security
This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM Transactions on Information and System Security. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM Transactions on Information and System Security.
Countries where authors publish in ACM Transactions on Information and System Security
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM Transactions on Information and System Security. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM Transactions on Information and System Security with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM Transactions on Information and System Security more than expected).
- False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids (2011)
- Proposed NIST standard for role-based access control (2001)
- The economics of information security investment (2002)
- Testing Intrusion detection systems (2000)
- Crowds (1998)
- The ARBAC97 model for role-based administration of roles (1999)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.