Finance and Stochastics

741 papers and 26.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 741 papers published in Finance and Stochastics in the last decades have received a total of 26.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Finance and Stochastics usually cover Finance (689 papers), Economics and Econometrics (397 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (210 papers) specifically the topics of Stochastic processes and financial applications (655 papers), Economic theories and models (287 papers) and Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (209 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Finance and Stochastics are Ole E. Barndorff–Nielsen, Alexander Schied, Hans Föllmer, Farshid Jamshidian, Yuri Kabanov, Thaleia Zariphopoulou, David Hobson, Ioannis Karatzas, Nizar Touzi and Patrick Cheridito.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Finance and Stochastics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Finance and Stochastics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Finance and Stochastics.

Countries where authors publish in Finance and Stochastics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Finance and Stochastics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Finance and Stochastics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Finance and Stochastics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025