The Pan-Pacific Entomologist

1.1k papers and 5.8k indexed citations

About

The 1.1k papers published in The Pan-Pacific Entomologist in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations. Papers published in The Pan-Pacific Entomologist usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (818 papers), Insect Science (512 papers) and Ecology (328 papers) specifically the topics of Plant and animal studies (360 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (238 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (230 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Pan-Pacific Entomologist are Andrew J. Beattie, John T. Sorensen, Frank D. Parker, Wee L. Yee, Steven J. Seybold, Lynn S. Kimsey, Richard M. Bohart, Ted C. MacRae, Vincent J. Tepedino and Timothy Myles.

In The Last Decade

The Pan-Pacific Entomologist

989 papers receiving 5.1k citations

Countries where authors publish in The Pan-Pacific Entomologist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Pan-Pacific Entomologist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Pan-Pacific Entomologist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Pan-Pacific Entomologist more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Pan-Pacific Entomologist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Pan-Pacific Entomologist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Pan-Pacific Entomologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026