Countries where authors publish in New Zealand Entomologist
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Zealand Entomologist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Zealand Entomologist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Zealand Entomologist more than expected).
Fields of papers published in New Zealand Entomologist
This network shows the impact of papers published in New Zealand Entomologist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Zealand Entomologist.
About New Zealand Entomologist
The 1.0k papers published in New Zealand Entomologist in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations . Papers published in New Zealand Entomologist usually cover Insect Science (430 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (611 papers) and Ecological Modeling (56 papers) specifically the topics of Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (188 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (185 papers), Plant and animal studies (185 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (143 papers), Fossil Insects in Amber (110 papers), Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (110 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (101 papers) and Hemiptera Insect Studies (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Zealand Entomologist are Ricardo L. Palma, J. C. Watt, G. Kuschel, Rowan M. Emberson, J. A. Berry, Richard A. B. Leschen, Brenda M. May, A. C. Harris, Brian Patrick and Gary M. Barker.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.