The Great Lakes Entomologist

1.4k papers and 6.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in The Great Lakes Entomologist in the last decades have received a total of 6.6k indexed citations. Papers published in The Great Lakes Entomologist usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (813 papers), Insect Science (699 papers) and Ecology (583 papers) specifically the topics of Forest Insect Ecology and Management (367 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (361 papers) and Plant and animal studies (313 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Great Lakes Entomologist are William L Hilsenhoff, J. E. McPherson, Robert A. Haack, Ann B. Swengel, J. Mark Scriber, B. H. King, Daniel K. Young, Toby R. Petrice, Robert W. Husband and Kenneth F. Raffa.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Great Lakes Entomologist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Great Lakes Entomologist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Great Lakes Entomologist.

Countries where authors publish in The Great Lakes Entomologist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Great Lakes Entomologist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Great Lakes Entomologist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Great Lakes Entomologist more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025