The Netherlands Journal of Medicine

773 papers and 7.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 773 papers published in The Netherlands Journal of Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations. Papers published in The Netherlands Journal of Medicine usually cover Surgery (189 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (162 papers) and Epidemiology (140 papers) specifically the topics of Therapeutic Advances in Cystic Fibrosis Research (30 papers), Eosinophilic Esophagitis (21 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Netherlands Journal of Medicine are Jan Willem Haveman, R.M. Wirnsberger, Harold de Valk, Wilmar M. Wiersinga, Olaf H. Klungel, Martin Tepper, Bart van Hoek, A Hartkamp, Jan Nouwen and Gerba Buunk.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Netherlands Journal of Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Netherlands Journal of Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Netherlands Journal of Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in The Netherlands Journal of Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Netherlands Journal of Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Netherlands Journal of Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Netherlands Journal of Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025