The Hospice Journal

596 papers and 6.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 596 papers published in The Hospice Journal in the last decades have received a total of 6.5k indexed citations. Papers published in The Hospice Journal usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (238 papers), Clinical Psychology (197 papers) and General Health Professions (146 papers) specifically the topics of Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (232 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (156 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Hospice Journal are William E. Haley, Diana J. Wilkie, Mary L. S. Vachon, Avery D. Weisman, Jane Marie Kirschling, Ronald S. Schonwetter, Margaret M. Hull, Brad Stuart, Dona J. Reese and Ora Gilbar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Hospice Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Hospice Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Hospice Journal.

Countries where authors publish in The Hospice Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Hospice Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Hospice Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Hospice Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025