Countries where authors publish in Regenerative Therapy
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Regenerative Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Regenerative Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regenerative Therapy more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Regenerative Therapy
This network shows the impact of papers published in Regenerative Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Regenerative Therapy.
About Regenerative Therapy
The 917 papers published in Regenerative Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 8.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Regenerative Therapy usually cover Genetics (225 papers), Urology (109 papers), Rehabilitation (95 papers), Biomaterials (119 papers) and Surgery (294 papers) specifically the topics of Mesenchymal stem cell research (217 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (147 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (118 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (94 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (92 papers), Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (89 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (86 papers) and Extracellular vesicles in disease (60 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Regenerative Therapy are Jun Takahashi, Masayuki Yamato, Yasuhiko Tabata, Hiroshi Sunami, Edward Hosea Ntege, Yusuke Shimizu, Yueh‐Hsun Yang, Teruo Okano, Goshi Shiota and Xin Su.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.