The Michigan Mathematical Journal

2.6k papers and 32.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in The Michigan Mathematical Journal in the last decades have received a total of 32.3k indexed citations. Papers published in The Michigan Mathematical Journal usually cover Geometry and Topology (1.4k papers), Mathematical Physics (973 papers) and Applied Mathematics (862 papers) specifically the topics of Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (446 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (360 papers) and Holomorphic and Operator Theory (315 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Michigan Mathematical Journal are Barrett O’Neill, Frank Harary, Wilfred Kaplan, Raoul Bott, Ch. Pommerenke, Eugenio Calabi, L. A. Coburn, Sanford S. Miller, Petru T. Mocanu and Norman Steenrod.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Michigan Mathematical Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Michigan Mathematical Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Michigan Mathematical Journal.

Countries where authors publish in The Michigan Mathematical Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Michigan Mathematical Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Michigan Mathematical Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Michigan Mathematical Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025