Countries where authors publish in Supramolecular chemistry
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Supramolecular chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Supramolecular chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Supramolecular chemistry more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Supramolecular chemistry
This network shows the impact of papers published in Supramolecular chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Supramolecular chemistry.
About Supramolecular chemistry
The 2.3k papers published in Supramolecular chemistry in the last decades have received a total of 26.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Supramolecular chemistry usually cover Spectroscopy (1.2k papers), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (478 papers) and Organic Chemistry (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (991 papers), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (725 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (426 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (392 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (229 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (184 papers), Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (183 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (177 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Supramolecular chemistry are Werner M. Nau, Michael J. Hannon, Kumaresh Ghosh, L.J. Childs, Apurba Lal Koner, Paul D. Beer, Susan E. Matthews, Jerry L. Atwood, John A. Ripmeester and Yu Liu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.