Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The economic value of targeting aging
2021130 citationsAndrew Scott, Martin Ellison et al.Nature Agingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Scott more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Scott. The network helps show where Andrew Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Scott.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Scott based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Scott. Andrew Scott is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Scott, Andrew, Martin Ellison, & David Sinclair. (2021). The economic value of targeting aging. Nature Aging. 1(7). 616–623.130 indexed citations breakdown →
Scott, Andrew, et al.. (2011). Lord Lester's Defamation Bill 2010: a distorted view of the public interest?. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 16(1). 6–18.3 indexed citations
7.
Scott, Andrew. (2010). The territorial scope of British employment legislation. 640–672.1 indexed citations
8.
Ellison, Martin & Andrew Scott. (2009). Learning and Price Volatility in Duopoly Models of Resource Depletion. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
9.
Marcet, Albert, et al.. (2008). In Search of a theory of debt management. Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona).32 indexed citations
10.
Scott, Andrew. (2007). The same river twice? Jameel v. Wall Street Journal Europe. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).
11.
Scott, Andrew. (2006). Last rites for the two-thirds rule in EC merger control?. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 619–630.1 indexed citations
Ellison, Martin & Andrew Scott. (2001). Sticky Prices And Volatile Output. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).3 indexed citations
15.
Uhlig, Harald & Andrew Scott. (1999). Fickle Investors: An Impediment to Growth?. Tilburg University Research Portal.5 indexed citations
16.
Pont, J de & Andrew Scott. (1999). BEYOND ROAD ROUGHNESS: INTERPRETING ROAD PROFILE DATA.. Road and transport research.10 indexed citations
Nugent, Neill, Simón Bulmer, & Andrew Scott. (1995). The European union : annual review of activities.7 indexed citations
19.
Nugent, Neill, Simón Bulmer, & Andrew Scott. (1993). The European community 1992 : annual review of activities.1 indexed citations
20.
Scott, Andrew. (1991). Fading loyalties : the Australian Labor Party and the working class. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.