Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West.
19921.0k citationsRoderick Nash et al.The American Historical Reviewprofile →
Wilderness and the American Mind.
1968976 citationsLewis Atherton, Roderick NashThe Journal of Southern Historyprofile →
Wilderness and the American Mind
1968371 citationsFred G. Evenden, Roderick NashJournal of Wildlife Managementprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Roderick Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roderick Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roderick Nash more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roderick Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roderick Nash. The network helps show where Roderick Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roderick Nash
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roderick Nash.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roderick Nash based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Roderick Nash. Roderick Nash is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.