The Clinical Supervisor

833 papers and 8.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 833 papers published in The Clinical Supervisor in the last decades have received a total of 8.7k indexed citations. Papers published in The Clinical Supervisor usually cover Social Psychology (569 papers), Clinical Psychology (436 papers) and Public Administration (168 papers) specifically the topics of Counseling Practices and Supervision (529 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (263 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (231 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Clinical Supervisor are Marion Bogo, C. Edward Watkins, L. DiAnne Borders, John T. Pardeck, Michael V. Ellis, Carolyn Knight, Alfred Kadushin, Rodney K. Goodyear, Carmen Ortiz Hendricks and Angela Shen Ryan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Clinical Supervisor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Clinical Supervisor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Clinical Supervisor.

Countries where authors publish in The Clinical Supervisor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Clinical Supervisor. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Clinical Supervisor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Clinical Supervisor more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025