Prospects

1.8k papers and 13.2k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Prospects in the last decades have received a total of 13.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Prospects usually cover Education (747 papers), Political Science and International Relations (344 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (307 papers) specifically the topics of Global Educational Policies and Reforms (238 papers), Education Systems and Policy (145 papers) and Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (126 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Prospects are Sir John Daniel, Paulo Freiré, Yong Zhao, Mel Ainscow, Philip G. Altbach, Stephen P. Heyneman, Clementina Acedo, Jandhyalá B. G. Tilak, Rae Lesser Blumberg and Harry Anthony Patrinos.

In The Last Decade

Prospects

1.1k papers receiving 8.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Prospects

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Prospects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Prospects.

Countries where authors publish in Prospects

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Prospects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Prospects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prospects more than expected).

COVID-19 as a catalyst for educational change 2020 2026 2022 2024159
  1. COVID-19 as a catalyst for educational change (2020)
  2. The “new normal” in education (2020)

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026