Art Documentation Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America · 1×
×1.9558/290MUSEO
×2.5253/100US
×0.5144/289VAPA
×3.1149/48HI
×2.127/13ARCHI
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in TEXTILE
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in TEXTILE. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in TEXTILE with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites TEXTILE more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in TEXTILE. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in TEXTILE.
About TEXTILE
The 424 papers published in TEXTILE in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations . Papers published in TEXTILE usually cover Museology (233 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (82 papers), Urban Studies (79 papers), Architecture (14 papers) and Archeology (6 papers) specifically the topics of Fashion and Cultural Textiles (193 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (150 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (52 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (44 papers), Public Spaces through Art (28 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (14 papers), Architecture and Computational Design (14 papers) and Art, Technology, and Culture (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in TEXTILE are Joanna Berzowska, Lucy Norris, Andrew Brooks, Beverly Lemire, Dinah Eastop, Elisha P. Renne, Kirsty Robertson, Ingun Grimstad Klepp, Sonja Andrew and Jane Gary Harris.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.